James Gunn’s blockbuster reboot is sparking heated debate online, with viewers seeing it as political commentary supporting Palestinians and criticizing Israel’s military actions
James Gunn’s new Superman reboot is igniting fierce debate across social media platforms. While the movie avoids naming real nations, many see its depiction of military aggression and civilians under siege—particularly children—as a direct parallel to Israel’s military operations in Gaza.
One scene, in particular, shows a heavily armed force crossing a border to attack civilians, placing children's lives in grave danger.
Audiences have zeroed in on this moment, calling it a striking commentary on the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
Despite the fictional settings of Boravia and Jarhanpur, many argue that the similarities are impossible to miss.
One user wrote on X: “Y’all were not kidding about how anti-Israel and pro-Palestine that Superman movie was, and they were not slick with it AT ALL.”
Another added: “Superman was so openly anti-Israel and god it was so good.”
A third posted: “Not going to lie I really like the anti-Israel sentiment from Superman and now I know James Gunn is always standing on business.”
Symbolic Settings Fuel Claims of Pro-Palestine Message
While neither Gunn nor Warner Bros. has confirmed any explicit reference to Israel or Palestine, the film’s narrative of border incursions and the targeting of vulnerable civilians has resonated powerfully with audiences sensitive to the violence in Gaza.
The decision to use fictional nations follows a tradition in superhero films of creating stand-ins for real-world conflicts.
Viewers argue that by showing the suffering of civilians and the brutal tactics of an invading military force, the film positions itself firmly against Israel’s military campaign while offering clear sympathy for the Palestinian people.
Some social media posts described it as the “most obvious pro-Palestine content” ever seen in a major studio release, with users praising the film for its apparent willingness to tackle the subject head-on.
Others expressed gratitude that such a high-profile franchise would attempt to raise awareness about the crisis.
Director’s Vision and Political Backlash
Gunn has repeatedly described his take on Superman as an immigrant story grounded in themes of morality, justice, and empathy.
He has spoken about wanting to reframe the character as an outsider grappling with questions of power and ethics—an approach that has fueled interpretations of the film as siding with marginalized and oppressed communities.
In interviews, Gunn has acknowledged the political elements in his storytelling but rejected criticism that he should soften or alter his approach to appease viewers who disagree. This stance has sparked backlash among some U.S. commentators, who accuse the film of delivering a thinly veiled political attack on Israel.
The film marks the beginning of Gunn’s new vision for the DC Universe, with David Corenswet stepping into the role of Clark Kent/Superman and Rachel Brosnahan as Lois Lane. The cast also includes Nicholas Hoult as Lex Luthor, Isabela Merced as Hawkgirl, and Nathan Fillion in a supporting role.
Despite the controversy, the movie has delivered a strong box office performance, earning $217 million globally in its opening weekend.
Domestic sales in the United States and Canada totaled $122 million, with international markets contributing an additional $95 million.